My experiment to see if Technorati can be a viable alternative to trackback, now that Jeremy Zawodny has declared that trackbacks are dead, seems to have been a failure.
Not having written any blog posts for nine months means I haven't had the opportunity to observe how Technorati handles my blog. It was fun, then, sending out ping to the service. I was pleasantly surprised to see my post show up in the list of entries referencing Jeremy's post. However, I wonder why the entry featured only the two words within the anchor tag and didn't provide any additional context. Really, "had enough" is hardly interesting enough for anyone to clickthrough. The entry didn't even have a real title for my post.
The Technorati link search also seems to behave strangely. For one thing, it is very slow. I think the nonresponsiveness of the site is fairly well acknowledged, but I'm willing to forgive a little performance problem--running a successful site is hard. But inconsistent results are more troubling.
I just ran a search for pages linking to Jeremy's post. The results seem to be switching back and forth between "26 sites, 3 links in the last 2 days" and "31 sites, 18 links in the last 1 day". This is hardly inspiring my confidence in services like Technorati providing an accurate and timely view of events unfolding in the blogosphere.
I wonder whether a centralized service like Technorati is even the appropriate solution for this particular problem. While there may debates over the number of "real" blogs, the number is clearly increasing rapidly. Assuming that a central store can efficiently handle all of this growing data seems silly.
Isn't the right solution to a distributed problem like this to find a way for the individual sites to keep track of which other sites are linking to them, using some type of notification system. Maybe something like, oh, well, a trackback?
The current trackback system may well be flawed, but that doesn't mean the idea is wrong. It may be unrealistic to expect Technorati to collect and index hundreds of thousands or even millions of posts each day. It is perfectly realistic, however, to imagine Jeremy maintaining a list of a few dozen sites linking to the one or two or three entries that he writes each day.